Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Defamation in the Internet Age
With the proliferation of the Internet, communication is fast, easy and convenient. Within the past few years, social networking has grown at an astonishing rate. Sites such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter allow us to share our thoughts and ideas with the masses. But, what if those thoughts are not so nice?
Can you bring a defamation suit against others who have made negative public postings about you? It depends on what is said and to whom.
Defamation comes in two types: spoken statements (called slander) and written statements (called libel). On the Internet, I would submit that it is possible to encounter both types. For example, a YouTube video could contain spoken statements (such as from a person's webcam) that would constitute slander. On the other hand, Twitter or Facebook posts are typed statements and would be examples of libel.
The key to establishing a defamation case is to prove someone made false statements with a degree of fault to one or more third parties. There also has to be some type of harm.
Falsity is a must. Basic trash talk or calling people names does not count. Opinions do not constitute defamation either.
Most of the cases I see, especially from the Internet, fall into this category. That's not to say that you have to sit and take it, but it is not defamation. Such statements still could constitute false light, invasion of privacy, infliction of emotional distress, harassment, etc., but those are potential topics for other columns.
If someone makes a false statement to your face, that is not defamation unless it is heard by someone else. The statements have to be made to a third party, but it is not necessary that you hear it firsthand. As long as you can prove the statement was made (such as a public forum), that is good enough.
Whether the statement is made or published to a third party is a tough element to prove in slander cases. It usually is a he-said, she-said case. Who is the jury going to believe? If there is some type of recording of the statement, that is the best proof of what was said. Obviously, written statements are easier to prove as to their content. (If it was said on a private forum or private email - it can not be considered defamation or libel)
You also must prove there was some sort of harm done. You do not have to show actual monetary loss. Damage to your reputation, humiliation, and mental anguish are examples of harm.
What about that "degree of fault" language I mentioned? Well, if you are a private citizen, you have to prove only that the false statements were made negligently by the offender. However, for public figures, it is harder to prove defamation because you must show the statements were made maliciously. If you are a public figure, you have placed yourself in a position of some important public controversy. You are willingly in the limelight. So, if you ever run for public office, make sure you have a thick skin.
There are other nuances to the law, but those are the highlights. If you believe you have been the victim of defamation, consult an attorney.
DISCLAIMER: Every situation is different. Nothing in this article should be considered specific legal advice.
Jonathan Schmidt is a partner with Benson & Schmidt LLP.
(this does not cover "False Light" when truthful statements can be made in a 'false light' to discredit another's reputation - which is actionable in many states in U.S.)
Labels:
defamation,
false accusations,
libel,
nuances,
slander,
truth
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
more reasons to NEVER EVER do ONLINE DATING! or HOOK UP WITH ANYONE ONLINE! by Lou Sessinger A homeless man who used a phony investment sche...
-
Cyberpaths come from all walks of life. Seemingly the most inocuous and upstanding persons have secret lives where they feel powerful &...
-
Has your favorite dating site gotten complaints? are they a RIP OFF? Click any of the links below and find out!! ADULT SITES #1 ADULT SITES ...
-
Warning sounded over 'flirting robots' Those entering online dating forums risk having more than their hearts stolen. A program that...
-
By Declan Harvey The government's top legal adviser has issued a new warning over abusive tweets and Facebook posts. Attorney General Do...
-
This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.
-
We are publishing these; recieved from Stone's victims - as examples to our many readers of what these harassers will do and continue to...
-
By James Titcomb A jilted boyfriend was jailed today for taking revenge on his ex-lover - by putting their home-made sex videos onto the int...
-
Think you know who your real online friends are? You could be just a few hops away from a cybercriminal in today's social networks By Ke...
-
Written by the Fighter Team (originally published December 02, 2005) Here's the question - is it LEGAL to expose a cheater or abuser onl...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(355)
-
▼
August
(29)
- 8,000 Menacing Posts Tests Limits of Twitter Speech
- You've Got H@TE MAIL!
- Top 5 Technologies used to Cyberbully
- Why Can't I Let Go of the Cyberpath?
- Bi-Polars and Internet Relationships
- Match.com Can't Screen for Sex Offenders
- Man Violates Court Order & CyberHarasses his Ex
- Some Take Their Hate Online
- Internet Harasser Lured into Harassing Police
- Wife Traumatised by Husband's Harassment
- Cyberpaths -- Exposed & On The Attack
- Stalkers Cause PTSD - Sometimes for Years... or Life
- Facebook - Not So Private!
- "I GO ONLINE TO DESTROY YOU"
- THE CYBERPATH
- Another Online Dating Nightmare
- ONLINE TARGETING & HARASSMENT
- 10 Internet Daters Die After Flying to Africa with...
- Blogger Fights for First Amendment Rights
- Spotting the Internet Liar
- CYBERBULLIES
- The Internet & the First Amendment
- Search for Suspect Who Sent Topless Pics to Woman'...
- UPDATE: Internet Terrorist: Betsy Ashby aka Guardian
- Craigslist Affair Ends With Restraining Order
- REVENGE.COM: HOW THE INTERNET FUELS THE BATTLE OF ...
- Defamation in the Internet Age
- How True Love or Tragedy is Only a Click Away
- Frightening Software Shows What You’re Looking at ...
-
▼
August
(29)
0 comments:
Post a Comment