Friday, August 26, 2011
Match.com Can't Screen for Sex Offenders
By Benjamin Radford
One of the world's top dating websites, Match.com, announced that it would begin checking its members against a national sex offender registry. The announcement was made about a week after a class-action lawsuit was filed against the company by two women who claim men they met through the service sexually harassed them.
Whether an attempt to ward off future lawsuits or merely a publicity stunt, the measure is nearly worthless and in fact may do more harm than good by fostering a false sense of security. There are several obvious flaws with the plan.
The first is that users on social networking and matchmaking websites typically do not have their identities verified. Thus anyone (including convicted sex offenders ) can post whatever name they wish to use on the site and easily avoid triggering a match on registries.
Even if Match.com members' names were somehow verified, names are very common. A match with a name on a sex offender registry would also require a matching address to be sure it's the same person. Anyone can rent a post office box (or use a friend's mailing address) to easily avoid triggering an alert.
Second, even if the information provided to Match.com was completely accurate, it may not match what's on the nation's sex offender registries, which are notoriously unreliable. A 2010 study of Vermont's sex offender registry found that half of the entries sampled contained significant mistakes and wrong information, including two people who should not have been listed. Audits in other states, including Georgia and Texas, found that the registry information for offenders was often wrong, incomplete and outdated.
Third, statistics show that relatively few assaults are committed by convicted sex offenders. That is, a given person (adult or child) is far more likely to be sexually assaulted by someone who is not listed on any sex offender registry than a convicted sex offender. The vast majority of physical and sexual assaults are committed by friends, family and other loved ones, not a recently met stranger hiding a sex offense conviction. This is one of the fundamental flaws of Megan's Laws and other offender notification measures: They distract attention and resources away from the greater threat.
Even Match.com's president, Mandy Ginsberg, acknowledged that the new measures "remain highly flawed." The rules of safe dating have not changed in decades: Meet in a public place, tell a friend where you're going and don't give out personal information too early.
Benjamin Radford is deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer science magazine and author of six books.
Another reason to NEVER USE ONLINE DATING!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
more reasons to NEVER EVER do ONLINE DATING! or HOOK UP WITH ANYONE ONLINE! by Lou Sessinger A homeless man who used a phony investment sche...
-
Cyberpaths come from all walks of life. Seemingly the most inocuous and upstanding persons have secret lives where they feel powerful &...
-
Has your favorite dating site gotten complaints? are they a RIP OFF? Click any of the links below and find out!! ADULT SITES #1 ADULT SITES ...
-
Warning sounded over 'flirting robots' Those entering online dating forums risk having more than their hearts stolen. A program that...
-
By Declan Harvey The government's top legal adviser has issued a new warning over abusive tweets and Facebook posts. Attorney General Do...
-
This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.
-
We are publishing these; recieved from Stone's victims - as examples to our many readers of what these harassers will do and continue to...
-
By James Titcomb A jilted boyfriend was jailed today for taking revenge on his ex-lover - by putting their home-made sex videos onto the int...
-
Think you know who your real online friends are? You could be just a few hops away from a cybercriminal in today's social networks By Ke...
-
Written by the Fighter Team (originally published December 02, 2005) Here's the question - is it LEGAL to expose a cheater or abuser onl...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(355)
-
▼
August
(29)
- 8,000 Menacing Posts Tests Limits of Twitter Speech
- You've Got H@TE MAIL!
- Top 5 Technologies used to Cyberbully
- Why Can't I Let Go of the Cyberpath?
- Bi-Polars and Internet Relationships
- Match.com Can't Screen for Sex Offenders
- Man Violates Court Order & CyberHarasses his Ex
- Some Take Their Hate Online
- Internet Harasser Lured into Harassing Police
- Wife Traumatised by Husband's Harassment
- Cyberpaths -- Exposed & On The Attack
- Stalkers Cause PTSD - Sometimes for Years... or Life
- Facebook - Not So Private!
- "I GO ONLINE TO DESTROY YOU"
- THE CYBERPATH
- Another Online Dating Nightmare
- ONLINE TARGETING & HARASSMENT
- 10 Internet Daters Die After Flying to Africa with...
- Blogger Fights for First Amendment Rights
- Spotting the Internet Liar
- CYBERBULLIES
- The Internet & the First Amendment
- Search for Suspect Who Sent Topless Pics to Woman'...
- UPDATE: Internet Terrorist: Betsy Ashby aka Guardian
- Craigslist Affair Ends With Restraining Order
- REVENGE.COM: HOW THE INTERNET FUELS THE BATTLE OF ...
- Defamation in the Internet Age
- How True Love or Tragedy is Only a Click Away
- Frightening Software Shows What You’re Looking at ...
-
▼
August
(29)
0 comments:
Post a Comment