Showing posts with label attack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attack. Show all posts

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Should Victims Embrace Docile Victimhood? Or Fight Back?

For all victims & those who tell them to "get over it" and "move on":

Psychopath Survivor Pictures, Images and Photos

by writer Kathy Kracjo

I am death on people telling the victim that it's a sin to fight back. They are pressuring the victim to do the very thing that causes victims to suffer terrible shame in the aftermath of abuse -- give themselves up to it.


That shame we feel at doing so is an infallible indicator that it's wrong. No one needs a book or a preacher to tell them what's right and wrong. We KNOW that's wrong. Deep down inside we feel how wrong it is to give ourselves up to abuse. Doing so makes us feel like a worm. A doormat. We know it's lack of backbone. We sense the prostitution in it. We feel utterly degraded by it.

The only excuse for it is being subjected to overwhelming force so that we haven't the power to resist. Which is rape. Which is why we feel deeply violated by it. Whether it's sexual rape or any other kind.

So, we know that we must resist when we can. If only for the sake of our self respect.

And anyone who tells us that we shouldn't fight the aggressor might as well order us to be a self masochist who injures himself.

They are pressuring the victim to prostitute themselves to abuse. How degrading! They are pressuring the victim to do what causes a human being unbearable shame. How cruel! They are pressuring the victim to do what goes against the laws of nature, our instinct for self preservation. They are pressuring the victim to commit the worst breech of faith, the worst betrayal, there is -- treason against your very self by delivering yourself up to abuse.


That's what Joan of Arc called it -- "treason," "wretched treason." She preferred the stake.

If it would be wrong to surrender another person for abuse, why should it be right to surrender yourself to abuse?

Trying to force the victim to do that is what the narcissist does! It's bad enough to abuse someone, but when you become so sadistic that you make them bend over for it on top of it all, you have crossed the line into extreme perversity, the Sin of Sodom.

Docile victimhood is NOT a virtue, and people who think it is are devoid of moral sense. They are people who don't think about what they say any more than a parrot does. Nothing proves that easier than to just then ask them, "Well what if the abuse happenes to be sexual rape? Do you say the victim should bend over for it?"

Certainly not! These are the same folks who would say that a woman who bent over for it liked it and was a whore. They would say she must fight tooth and nail.

And that's just as stupid, because sometimes she doesn't dare fight. If she did, she'd get killed.

There are few ways that the victim of narcissistic abuse can fight back, especially when the victim is a child.
And whenever the victim does find a way to put up a resistance, there is always some holier-than-thou around to tell him or her that it's a sin.

You can't do that to people. That puts them in an impossible situation. That's what breaks minds.

Horrifying example. A kid is getting bullied at school. He periodically gets his head flushed in a toilet, while the "innocent" bystanders watch and laugh. He gets his lunch money stolen daily.

Now, would you willingly walk into a place where you know that someone is waiting for you to abuse you? Of course not. But we expect him to. So, when he skips school, he gets punished. We thus force him to present himself there daily for abuse. If he doesn't it's a sin.

So he punches the bully. Oh-oh. Now he committed another sin. He gets punished for that too, because "violence" (which force used in self defense ain't) is a sin.

So, he resorts to the last resort, the really stupid thing: he tells the counsellors about the abuse. They have "a talk" with the bully. Now the bully punishes him for that by escalating the abuse.

What is that kid going to do? We are forcing him to offer himself up for abuse like a sacrificial vicitm every single day.

Something's gotta give. He will decide to kill himself, and he may well decide to take others with him.

You can't force people to docilely submit to abuse. That's the most odious thing you can do to a human being. You are subjecting him to a slavery more odious and profound than that of the slaves, a kind of slavery we haven't seen since the macabre executions of the Middle Ages = slavery as someone else's property for the purpose of vicitimization.

Indeed, the victim isn't his own property if you deny his free will to the the extent that you deny him the right even to self preservation.

Those who think the Bible demands this had better re-read it. And study what the scholars have found and Church authorities have admitted -- how long after the events it was written, whom it was really written by, and how much it's been edited and added to since.

And applying a little common sense doesn't hurt either. For example, if Jesus thought defending yourself is a sin, why does scripture mention in several places that the apostles were armed? Duh, they were his bodyguards. And of course he told the three of them with him to put up their swords when he was captured -- because they were vastly outnumbered and just would have gotten killed. Interpreting that action as some sort of general prohibition again the use the use of force is absurd.

Common sense, common sense, common sense. There is nothing more dangerous than words of scripture in a mouth with its brain turned off.

Very often the victim can't fight back. At least not without that resistence resulting in greater harm to himself. But whenever he can, he has every right to. Indeed, the only morality a bully knows is a punch in the nose. It does work.
And the victims of a narcissist's abuse through character asssination have every right to accuse their accuser, to point the accusing finger right back at the narcissist to show that it's all projection. That's the victim's only defense! He or she should not be treated as though they are the attacker.

Character assassination is not nothing. It is character ASSASSINATION. I call it the abuse that keeps on abusing for the rest of that person's life. A crime in progress for the rest of that person's life, because that bad reputation pursues and continually damages the victim for the rest of their life. The victim has every right to defend himself from this ongoing abuse in whatever way he can.

SOURCE


NOTE: When other website owners find the need to participate in a smear campaign about a victim of someone else on their site -- members need to think twice. Especially support & recovery sites.

Especially when they elevate that predator to special status. How hateful.


Now ask yourself, why is it SO IMPORTANT to smear and attack someone for speaking their truth? If it really was all B.S. you'd let things stand because it would be so important. And to those who fall away because they are afraid to still be friends with the victims? Shame on you.

Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.
~ Whittaker Chambers

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Man Advertised on Craigslist for Models - then Tortured Them


By Matt Blake

A personal trainer who called himself 'Danger' has been accused of using Craigslist to stalk women and 'torture' them. Dejon Miller, 35, from Hollywood, allegedly used the advertising website to recruit female models to pose for his fitness website. But when they responded he would verbally abuse them and beat them, it is claimed.

Miller, from Los Angeles, was arrested on Wednesday after his girlfriend went to police claiming he had beaten her until she lost consciousness in an attack that police described as 'torture'. 'The victim actually did lose consciousness and probably was really close to actually passing away,' LAPD Det. Brandy Arzate told KTLA.com.

While he didn't give details of the abuse, he added: 'It was very unusual techniques that he would use. Something as a detective that I haven't come across before.' His charges include attempted murder, false imprisonment and spousal abuse. His bail was set at $1.3 million.

The woman said she met Miller after responding to an advert on Craigslist looking for fitness models. But police are also probing five similar claims by other women. 'If you Google him, he’ll look legit,' Det. Azarte told NBC. 'But the reality is if the women do end up in a relationship with him, there is a strong likelihood of abuse.'

On his website, SexyIsBack.com, Miller tells women: 'Let’s face it, all a woman really wants, is to be excitingly appealing and glamorous, right? If you want to be appealing you need the body. If you want to be exciting you need to be scene. If you want to be glamorous you need to be in style. Now with Dejon “DANGER” Miller’s creation of sexyisback!com, you have all 3 elements synergistically fused together to provide the ultimate experience of sexy.'

On his other website, e2fit.com, he adds: 'As a trainer, I like to keep things professional, realistic and a lil' funky at the same time - which you'll notice by my tattoos, many body piercings!'

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Another Woman Raped by Person She Met Online


By Leon Watson

Internet daters have been warned after a legal secretary was raped by a man she met on a popular dating website.

Peter Ramsey, 26, beat the woman to the ground, ripped off her tights and had sex with her when she refused him a goodnight kiss at her front door. Ramsey punched the 27-year-old repeatedly knocking out one of her front teeth and left her with 21 injuries. Her facial wounds were among the most shocking detectives investigating the case had ever seen.

The sex attacker was caught after using the victim's Oyster travelcard to board a nightbus within minutes of the attack in Clapham, south west London.

Ramsey and the woman had spent four days chatting on plentyoffish.com site which claims on its homepage to be 'responsible for more dates and more relationships than any other dating site'. They arranged to meet for drinks in Brixton town centre at 7pm.

She later said: 'He seemed like a nice guy. The date was going very well. I thought we had a lot in common.' In the early hours of August 27 last year they went for something to eat before climbing into a cab to her flat near Clapham Common. She believed he was going to walk her to her front door but when he lent in for a kiss and she pulled back, he 'switched'.

In the communal entrance to the block, he pinned her against the wall and rained down punches on her face until she slumped to the ground. When she screamed for help he used one hand to cover her mouth and pinch her nose shut, while continuing to hit her with the other fist. 'I thought I was going to die,' she told Inner London Crown Court.


A 'SEVERE RISK' TO WOMEN

Outside court DC Huggins praised the SOIT role which was crucial in securing the conviction. He said of the result: 'I feel relieved that somebody like Ramsey who had access via the internet to so many women, is now safely behind bars.

'He posed a severe risk to other women on that internet site, which he had been using for a number of years. I would urge people using dating websites to thoroughly vet the people they meet and before they spend time alone. I would also like to thank my SOIT officer, who had the initial contact with the victim. I would like to reassure other potential victims that there are people who are willing to listen to them and take their allegations very seriously in order to bring the perpetrator to justice.

'The victim in this case is relieved about the verdict. She was also concerned for other women and that if he had walked free, there would have been other victims. This woman was unrecognisable after the attack, compared to the woman who gave evidence. Fortunately she has recovered from her physical injuries. I have been in the police for 14 years and these were some of the most shocking facial injuries I have ever seen.'

Ramsey, who has several previous convictions for shoplifting and assaulting police officers, but none for violence or sexual offences against women, then stole the bleeding woman's bag.

As he left she staggered to her feet and called to a passing man, a Muslim on his way to Ramadan prayers, and he came to her aid. The victim's mother, who had heard the screams, also rushed out to find her disfigured and traumatised daughter.

In a further insult, before Ramsey fled, he said to the pedestrian of the two women: 'Don't worry about them - they're crazy.' The rapist then used the woman's stolen Oyster card on a passing N35 bus.

The following day he left two voicemails on the victim's mobile telling her he was sorry and had now sobered up. He said he was left feeling something had happened that 'wasn't good'.

Soon after her ordeal the woman was interviewed by a specialist SOIT (Sexual Offences Interview Technique) officer from Lambeth's Sapphire Unit. PC Damien Hutton-Baber worked closely with the victim to get her detailed account, an interview which was filmed and played to the jury to reduce her time in the witness box.

Ramsey was arrested a week after the attack when a DNA match appeared to have snared him. But when he lied he had not even met the woman on that day, officers were forced to dig deeper. DC Richard Huggins, the officer in charge of the investigation, examined CCTV footage from the bus which showed him on board near the scene.

Ramsey continued to deny the rape, changing his story at trial. He put forward the defence he had consensual sex with the woman but left her rowing with another man who must have beat her.

Ramsey boasted said he had been out with 'hundreds of women' and did not need to rape because he could get anyone he wanted. But he was found unanimously guilty following a trial.

Ramsey, of no fixed address but who had been staying with friends in Forest Hill, south east London, was convicted of rape, wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and theft.

Following the verdicts Judge Patricia Lees said: 'I would like an assessment of the defendant's future risk that he may pose to women. It seems to me the violence meted out was frankly horrific and wholly unnecessary to commit the offence of rape.'

Remanding him in custody ahead of sentence on April 27, Judge Lees warned him: 'You face an extremely lengthy sentence of imprisonment.' The court heard Ramsey has been diagnosed as biopolar while on remand.

Saturday, November 26, 2011

FOR THE VICTIMS: BETRAYAL, YOUR FEAR & THE CYBERPATH

Betrayal
Once you find out what the cyberpath is they may do a combination of any of the following:
  • Disappear and/or block you and/or change their nicknames, identity & emails
  • Lash out at you
  • Smear you
  • Belittle you & call you names
  • Tell everyone that you both know you are "crazy" or "stalking them" or (the oldest one there is) you're a "scorned man/woman."
  • many other nasty, malicious things worthy of a 9 year old

This is betrayal. This is what pathological people do when their 'mask of normalcy' is pulled off. You reel from it because you can't understand. You can't imagine what happened to the attentive loving guy you met who seemed understanding. Nothing happened. That wasn't the REAL PERSON. This monster who is out for your virtual heart is the real person.

Everything else? was a lie.


All you will get now is narcissistic rage. Anger that you busted them. And threats of harm to you, your family and so on. Just read through the stories on the right of our exposed predators and see how they treated their victims.

Take a look at Ed Hicks, Doug Beckstead, Dunetz/ Yidwithlid, Brad Dorsky or Dan Jacoby . Look at how they were to their targets once they got bored or angry with them. Watch their rage, their blame-shifting, their guilt tripping and their disappearing acts from the lives of people who people who really loved and cared about them.


The one thing we can tell you here at EOPC is that 90% of the time, the threats are a form of "control by temper tantrum." Like a 6 year old they are mad that you won't play their game or said "NO MORE" to them. Or they got bored and don't want to play with you anymore, so your emails and attention is suddenly ANNOYING. Now they kick, scream, say rude things & stomp away hoping you will be so upset you will let them start up their game again. Either with you or someone else.

Or, that you are so scared of them you dare don't expose them or tell others. DON'T FALL FOR IT!


And don't for a second think they haven't told their online friends, offline friends, partner/ spouse, job... that you are "obsessed with" them or a "scorned" person. So when you send just one more email or make one more call hoping for explanation, closure, something... they say "see!! see how she is!! she's nuts and won't leave me alone! she's trying to manipulate me!"

What childish bull.

If you really want to help them? Expose them. Make them accountable. Don't let them scare you into silence. Help others stay away! Maybe they will get their relationship/ marriage right. Maybe they will go into LONG TERM counseling. The odds are 98% of them don't.
"The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein

But don't let them scare you. Stand up to a bully no matter how long or what it takes. Take back what they took from you. Your power, your dignity and your peace of mind. - EOPC


~~~~~~~~~~~~
Betrayal, when realized, is a phenomenal existential feeling. Suddenly, your world is no longer the one you believed in. You question reality, but most of all you question yourself.

How, you wonder, could I have been so naive, stupid, blind, trusting, unseeing, unknowing? It may be difficult to believe, but these questions are good. YOU are the normal person, the one who aligns reality (he was so nice to me, he was my friend) with a cognitive belief: he ACTS as if he likes me, he TELLS me he likes me, I see no reason not to believe him because in my past, people who act and speak this way, CAN be trusted. There is congruency. But not now.


Suddenly, you learn that someone trusted - a spouse, lover, family member, close friend - has been putting you down, lying, manipulating others against you, and yet maintaining a stance of intimacy with you.

The world is not clear, the ground you stand on is wobbly. You will never feel good about this. You will not "Get Over" it. But you CAN move forward. You can do so by realizing that no matter how awful the betrayal, YOU are the normal person and this betrayal comes from rage.


This person envies you in some way, is enraged about it, and MUST put you down behind your back. They MUST harm you.

They have no choice. But you do.

In the world of normals, after we get over the shock, we can use this experience to become stronger, to help others, to learn to avoid this particular toxin, and to calm ourselves that the higher moral ground is ours. It's too bad this person acted as he did, we wish he did not, but we are NOT diminished by their pathology. Wiser, sadder, but never diminished.
~~~~

EOPC believes that cyberpathy is a form of pathology. Either narcissistic or sociopathic/ anti-social. Because its exploitative and the cyberpath has no remorse or guilt. Therefore we publish this article for the victims of cyberpaths.

Don't believe they aren't hurting you on purpose. They are. You are not the 'object' they treated you like. Stand up and tell them. They will probably disappear from your life while painting themselves as the victim - OF YOU!

Stop giving them the opportunity - stop trying to "get through" to them, stand up for yourself and starting healing you!
betrayed
Hurting You Isn't Something Narcissists Do by Accident
by Kathy Krajco


In all the jabber about narcissism, the worst noise is this idea that hurting you is something narcissists do by accident.

If you get nothing else out of "What Makes Narcissists Tick," get the message that frees you of that ridiculous belief. Which is nothing but a baseless assumption.

I don't ask you to take my word for this. Test what I say when I say that narcissists hurt you on purpose. Anyone can test any narcissist.

Here's how: The next time the narcissist is hurting your feelings or making you feel low, let your feelings show and tell him or her how they are making you feel asking them to stop it.Be prepared for a shock. Any normal human being would soften and let up, but a narcissist will do exactly the opposite.

What does that mean?

Is revving up their engines, kicking in the afterburners, and running you right over an "accident" after you show your soft underbelly and beg them to let up on you?

It's no "accident," that's for sure.

Want to see a narcissistic rage? That's no "accident" either. The test: Just fall to your knees in tears begging them to have a heart and stop kicking you around like dirt.
The narcissist's response? He or she blows up into a rage. Is that rage an "accident" when nothing but how deeply they are hurting you provokes it?

No, it's a willful and wanton outrage.

Now hear this: THEY DON'T DO IT BY ACCIDENT. They aren't just inconsiderate and touchy.

Test their "touchiness" (if you can do so safely, or have somebody not at the N's mercy test it - someone who can defend themselves).
Rage right back in their face. Act just as wild right back in their face. Threaten right back. Speak abusively right back.

Now any normal person would be provoked to rage by your doing this in their face. But narcissists are so UNtouchy that they do the opposite. Watch how instantaneously the raging narcissist becomes meek and mild and switches to his "I-wouldn't-hurt-a-fly-mask."

Don't take my word for it. Test it.

You CANNOT insult a narcissist who isn't in a position to bully you! It's impossible. Try it, you'll see. Your lack of vulnerability gives them skin a foot thick! (Not to mention a rubber spine.)

"Touchy" my you-know-what.

They aren't touchy at all. So perceived slights aren't what set them off. The VULNERABILITY of a TARGET OF OPPORTUNITY is what sets them off - IF there are no witnesses.

That's predation, not touchiness.

Narcissists aren't inconsiderate of your feelings. To the contrary, they are extremely considerate of your feelings. Your feelings are exactly what they are trying to affect. They closely observe how you react every time they do something to hurt you.

And they are like sharks, able to smell a drop of blood a mile away. Why? Because your hurt feelings are their pain killing drug.

They are addicted to it. Ever since childhood.

That's what their mental illness is, an addiction. (In fact, all addictions are classed as mental illness.)

So where do people get the stupid idea that narcissists aren't to blame for what they do?

It's asinine to think that narcissists can't control themselves when we see them controlling themselves perfectly whenever witnesses are present. So, what? being behind closed doors makes them suddenly out of control of themselves? Baloney.

Their problem isn't lack of self control; it's lack of conscience. Conscience is what makes people behave the same in the dark as in the light of day.

Okay, they have an addiction to trampling people. They are hooked on the childish high they get from throwing somebody down, stepping on the victim's back, and thumping their chest with a Tarzan yell.

But since when does an addiction amount to a carte blanche? An addiction is just a TEMPTATION. It doesn't remove the addict's responsibility to resist that temptation.

If a heroin addict sees you with heroin, he will attack and may kill you for it - IF there are no witnesses present.

But do we absolve him of his responsibility for the crime just because he's addicted to heroin? Of course not.

Same with the narcissist. Since childhood he has done this mind-altering drug of abusing people and is addicted to it. He addicted himself.
Yet addicted as he is, he demonstrates the ability to control himself by behaving whenever witnesses are present, misbehaving only when he thinks he can get away with it.

Innocence that is not.


He does what he does because nothing but getting his drug matters to him. So he has no conscience. He lives to get it, whenever he can get away with it.

So, hurting others isn't something narcissists do by accident. It's how they live.

The victims of narcissists must understand this. They must quit falling for the masks predation conceals itself behind.

I don't care how much the poor, little, ole narcissist whines that he didn't mean to, and claims that he has an excuse because HIS feelings were somehow hurt, and weeps about what a miserable childhood he had and how sad and forlorn he'll be if you go away, and all that crap. It's a joke.

Painful as this is to admit, the victims of narcissists MUST understand it. It's the bottom line. It predicates your choices.

Don't take my word for it: test and see. 2 + 2 = 4. Always. Even on Thursdays.

SOURCE

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Cyberpath, Predator: Narcissist, Psychopath

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

So, at bottom, the nature of the narcissist is the nature of a predator who preys on his own kind. The importance of that fact cannot be overstated. The brain of a predator just does not relate to the living soul of its prey. If you don't believe this, just watch PBS. Watch the behavior, and look into the eyes, of predatory animals while they're making a kill. There's nothing there. They are like machines at that moment. They must be, or they couldn't do it.

In other words, Nature has equipped them with hard-wired circuitry in the brain that takes over the moment prey is sighted when they are hungry. It suppresses what we could observe in that animal only a minute earlier while it was playing with its siblings or a waving leaf on a twig, tenderly nuzzling its offspring or mate. Perhaps it was even grieving over the death of a member of the pack. But that's all gone the moment it sights prey while hungry. Then suddenly it's a killing machine. It likes killing. Nature has endowed it with a taste for killing as necessary equipment for its survival. It even considers killing fun. Which is why we sometimes see in nature killing made sport: Chimpanzees (who don't eat meat) will gang-up on and attack a monkey, cruelly tearing it to pieces and having a blast over its heart-rending cries. Killer whales sometimes play with baby seals like a cat plays with a mouse. Wolves sometimes bring down and eviscerate prey they feed on the guts of till it dies and then walk away. Sorry, that's just the truth.

Humans are animals too and have that same predatory mode. Nature endowed us with it as hunters. It's in everyone. But in narcissists and sociopaths something has gone haywire. They go into this mode against their own kind. And they are permanently in this mode against all their own kind. Why? Because they don't view themselves as of our kind. They are of a superior kind. They think we are here to feed them, just as we think cattle are here to feed us. Correction: we do (or should) treat cattle humanely. We don't relate to them as objects like narcissists relate to us = like we relate to bugs or plants.

Compared to us, narcissists are gods. Alien beings. They can't help it. They are not to blame for feeling this way. Today the prognosis is poor. There is little sign of any real success in treating these people. Those who commit prosecutable offenses are repeat offenders — such as pedophile priests, sexual predators, and serial killers. They get this way as children and demonstrate it by torturing animals or murdering other children on a whim. Though they can't control their temptations, they CAN control their conduct. And this is what competent psychiatric care can really help them with. It can show them better ways to deal with their problems, making them resistant to temptation. In fact, I think it could build in some TRUE self-esteem to counterbalance their self hatred. (Lifelong treatment would be necessary to maintain it though.) And a lion tamer can walk into the lions' den. But they are still wild animals, so he can never be sure they won't give in to the temptation to attack the prey tantalizing them beyond their power to resist. We don't morally condemn those lions for being lions.

And the only thing more stupid and useless than morally condemning narcissists for being narcissists is trusting them. Don't tempt them. Just because a pedophile priest has behaved for the last five years doesn't mean he won't finally lose it and eat another altar boy. Indeed, it's cruel to tempt him daily thus! You wouldn't wave a bottle of whiskey in front of an alcoholic, would you? I don't see what's so difficult to understand about this. Talk therapy and/or punishment isn't the answer with PREDATORS.

We must do whatever it takes to minimize or eliminate their access to vulnerable prey as targets of opportunity. Period. For ever. Indeed, these people will thank us for it. Consider how many of them deliberately get themselves caught just to stop themselves.

Let's get a clue already and stop dangling bait before their eyes. There are many ways to do this: prison isn't the only one. For example, don't let him teach school or be a police officer. Don't give him power over his fellow employees. Don't elect him to be President for Life. Don't let him live off his parents till they die. Don't follow him on a purge to cleanse himself in the Holy Land. And if he steps over the line whack him, so that he thinks twice before doing it again.

And, especially, let's stop passing this curse from generation to generation by subjecting children to narcissistic parents. It takes the consent of the non-narcissistic parent for that to happen. So, just because your mother or father put up with it doesn't mean you should. If we began protecting the next generation today, this accursed cause of a vast amount of both the told and untold human suffering in this world would be gone in 50 years.


by Kathy Krajco

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Breakup then... Cyberstalk?


By Dane Schiller

Soon after a Massachusetts college student dumped her Houston-area fiancé, he sent her email and text messages to find out what happened, maybe win her back.

It didn't work. Things got ugly.

The ex-boyfriend is now accused of unleashing a torrent of hundreds of messages that grew so violent that the woman sought help from the FBI.

"I will tear you limb from limb," read one of the messages, according to copies shared with a magistrate. "I want to watch you suffer" and "I will come for you," read others.

Federal prosecutors accuse Christopher Hlavinka, 24, of using the Internet to cause "substantial emotional distress." He faces up to five years in prison if convicted.

On Tuesday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen Smith ordered Hlavinka, who was first taken into custody in June, to be released to his family pending trial. He also is to be tracked by GPS and largely confined to home and is not allowed to use computers or cell- phones with Web access.

One email can land him back behind bars and facing even more time.

Spotlight on stalking
The case highlights increasing concern about online harassment and stalking.

Hlavinka's former fiancée, identified in court by the initials S.H., was pushed to the edge by the harassment, according to the FBI. She moved multiple times to hide and sought psychological counseling as well as police protection.

FBI Special Agent Ryan McKee testified that Hlavinka mocked a protective order as well as police, and sent personal information about S.H. to her family and associates. "Jail does not scare me," Hlavinka reportedly told her. "Isn't it cute you think you can get protection against me?"

Hlavinka's computer showed he went to Google maps and other sites to research where S.H. and her parents lived, McKee said.

3 motivations
Defense attorney Brian Laviage argued for Hlavinka's conditional release at the hearing, saying his client has no criminal record; no history of physical violence; and that he belonged with his family and getting help rather than in prison.

He said Hlavinka's arrests, first by Fort Bend authorities and then by federal agents, and his time behind bars helped him accept that the relationship is over. He just wants to get on with his life, Laviage said.

David Buss, a psychology professor at the University of Texas at Austin, said by phone that stalkers usually exhibit three major motivations: They either want to get back together with the ex-partner, to interfere with an ex's romantic life, or to exact revenge.

"Cyber-stalking can be especially vicious because the stalkers are sitting behind computers, and so feel that they can stalk with the safety of their own house or work," he said.

original piece can be found here

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Judge Spares Woman Jail After she Plotted Attack on Internet 'Troll'

Judge spares mother jail after she plotted attack on internet 'troll' who posted horrific comments about disabled daughter





by Chris Greenwood



A mother who joined a revenge attack on a man responsible for a vile campaign of internet abuse against her disabled daughter has been spared prison.



Sylvia Hooper, 52, was described as a ‘decent and law-abiding’ woman who dedicated her life to her seriously ill daughter Kim Arnold. But she snapped after looking on helplessly as a cowardly bully sent her daughter a series of appalling comments via Facebook.



Mrs Hooper faced a jail sentence after identifying Christopher Berwick and confronting him outside his home in Chatham, Kent.



But a judge – who labelled the messages ‘disgraceful and shameful’ – took pity on Mrs Hooper after hearing they were part of a long-term campaign.



The case is the latest evidence of the growing impact of online bullying and abuse through social networking sites. Known as ‘trolling’, it sees abusers, who often hide behind a veil of anonymity or false identities, deluging their victims with cruel taunts. Campaigners have repeatedly called for websites to take swifter action against the ‘trolls’.



Miss Arnold was sent a series of messages via a false Facebook account that left her deeply depressed, Maidstone Crown Court was told. One labelled her a cripple and said that Miss Arnold, who is a wheelchair user, should be left to ‘roll down a hill'.



A judge at Maidstone Crown Court labelled the messages 'shameful' and took pity on Mrs Hooper after hearing they were part of a long-term campaign.



Another message read: ‘Your mother should have had an abortion. She only had you because she felt sorry for you.’



Mrs Hooper realised the culprit was Mr Berwick, who lived nearby, and joined her son Robert and his friend Soloman Taylor outside his home. Mr Hooper, 19, punched Mr Berwick after his mother said ‘hit him’ and the bully was then taken back to the family home by car. He was forced to crawl inside and make a ‘grovelling apology’ to his victim while on all fours. At one point he was hit on the chin with a rolled up newspaper.



Prosecutor Neil Sandys said Mr Berwick originally tried to blame his then girlfriend but eventually admitted being responsible. He said the Facebook exchange was ‘low, mean, base and shameful’ and added that Mr Berwick admitted doing it before.



Mrs Hooper’s solicitor Catharine Donnelly said the comments were ‘beyond the pale’ and told the court ‘none of us would be here today’ without his actions.



Speaking about Mrs Hooper, she said: ‘She is a decent woman who has devoted herself to her daughter. She has led a decent and law-abiding life. It is clear she is a woman who will never trouble these courts again. She was an encourager, rather than a hitter.’



Danny Moore, for Mr Hooper, said Mr Berwick got a kick out of ‘playing mind games with a severely disabled young lady’.



He highlighted how police told the victims there was nothing they could do and the bully was not prosecuted for sending malicious messages.




All three admitted assault but denied false imprisonment and the judge ruled that not guilty verdicts should be entered.



Judge Richard Polden said it ‘troubled him’ that Mrs Hooper had said, ‘hit him’, but accepted that Mr Hooper was acting out of a ‘protective instinct’ to his sister. He said: ‘I sentence you on the basis that Mr Berwick sent messages that were wholly disgraceful and shameful but then tried to put the blame on his girlfriend.’



Mrs Hooper was given a conditional discharge.



The two men were given community orders which included voluntary work.





original article

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Cyberpaths -- Exposed & On The Attack

As we continue to do our exposes, readers - you will see a type of pathological who - once revealed for the narcissistic sociopathic type he/ she is - will just attack, attack, attack. Yours is not the first, nor will be the last of our cyberpaths who have done this EXACT SAME THING! - EOPC

~~~~~~~~~~



WHEN THEY ATTACK

by Kathy Krajco



(We have replaced the word narcissists with predators for clarity - EOPC)



Professionals often say that predators "overreact" to the merest unintended slights and that they fly into a rage for the slightest reason. But this view seems anthropomorphic to me. I suspect it comes from forgetting that the predator on your couch is a pathological liar.



The truth is that predators attack for no reason. In fact, they are prompted to attack by anti-reasons.



Of course the predator on your couch says he did it in self defense! He whines that the victim said or did something to slight him or anger his tender, tender feelings. Were you born yesterday? predator = pathological liar. So, why do you expect him to confess to you that he is a predator = one who attacks any vulnerable target of opportunity?



I would hate to admit how long it took me to discover this, but in my experience, what triggers a predator Attack is nothing but a vulnerable target of opportunity.



Test predators. Parade bait before them when the coast looks clear so that the narc thinks later it will just be his word against the victim's. Then watch what happens.



You can push his Attack button by having the victim be very vulnerable, like say by showing great affection for the predator and giving a heartfelt plea for some in return. (Rather like a man I knew who asked a predator to marry him and got eviscerated for it.)



How does the predator react to what should evoke his love and affection? With a savage attack, that's how. Rather like any wild predator when you ring the dinner bell for it by giving it a swipe at a defenseless creature's soft underbelly.



Except that natural predators must be hungry at the time.



On second thought, I guess predators have to be hungry, too. But they always are. For, they have the kind of hunger that increases the more you feed it.



So much for the theory that predators are just too touchy. They ain't touchy at all.



Test that too. Indeed, try to provoke a predator. You can't. Go ahead, try.

The only way to get yourself a raging predator is to tempt it with defenseless bait when it thinks no one is watching.


Now that you have your predator raging, do one more thing. Have the victim rise up rage right back it its face.



Guess what happens? Presto chango! Rage off!



Instead of a raging predator, you now have a poor little meek and gentle angel who wouldn't hurt a fly and is heartbroken at the victim being so nasty.



Welcome to The Twilight Zone. I call this miraculous phenomenon "The Transfiguration."



I am not exaggerating. You witness the instantaneous substitution of one persona for its very antithesis in the blink of an eye. You don't know whether to pinch yourself or start throwing holy water at it. Because an Academy Award winner couldn't do that that fast.



It stuns you and gives you the creeps. Indeed, one facial expression doesn't melt into the other: the whole mask changes at once.



I call a predator's faces "masks" because when you see this happen you know that's what they are. You know that what's on the face is a lie. It's the Big Chill.



A stunning revelation. The predator's very face is a lie about what is really going on in the darkness behind that mask.

Tantrum Pictures, Images and Photos

~~~~~~~~~~

Some of our examples:



LOOKS LIKE SOMEONE CAUGHT MR. DUNETZ NOT ONCE - BUT TWICE - BEING A BULLY AND POSER!



ONE



TWO





Mr. Jacoby set up a website simply to threaten his victim and has been smearing her ever since. The website has since been removed.



btw, Mr. Capers? We are very aware of the threats you are issuing towards your numerous victims... and we're reporting them to authorities along with your multiple identities



~~~~~~~~~~~



Dark Soul as a Destroyer

By Sarah Strudwick

Psychopaths are known for their lack of fear, but at the same time they often have other associated personality disorders along side, such as malignant narcissism. They feel the need to have a constant fix of kind loving, empathic individuals that they can then slowly pull down to their own level. It’s a bit like the analogy I put in my book, Dark Souls, where they take a helpless spider and pull the legs off one by one—just to see what happens. Why do they do it? Because they can.

So why does the Dark Soul or psychopath feel the need to destroy their victims when the relationship is well and truly over?

Many targets complain that well after the relationship ends they are stalked by the psychopath, or they continue to bombard them with emails and spam. Sometimes they will try and befriend you on Facebook, or constantly monitor what you are doing by stalking you. Even when you have moved on with your life, recovering from financial hardship, emotional stress and so on, the psychopathic personality is not happy. With their own deep sense of self-hatred, they will often feel jealous, and may be vindictive by sending you viruses on your PC or other inconveniences. It’s their way of saying, “You think you have moved on, but I will be there in the background constantly monitoring you.”

It’s also their way of bringing you down to their disgustingly low level. On a conscious level, they know exactly what they are doing and want a reaction. They hope you will hate them as much as they hate themselves. Even if you have no evidence with them they want to continue contact, and being extremely narcissistic, it’s all about getting attention, any kind of attention. What better way to get your attention than, for example, to hack your computer or send you vile pictures on your computer? What better way for them to project their vile, angry, unowned thoughts and feelings back onto their victim, so that they do not have to own them?

Psychopaths are notorious for using sneaky underhanded tactics when it comes to playing dirty, whether it is getting the authorities or lawyers on their side, or other members of the family. They will always find a way to turn the tables back onto their victims and say they did nothing, creating crazymaking behaviour. If and when the victim finally has had enough and lashes back, the Dark Soul can then say, “See I told you she/he was crazy – look what she did!”

Because the psychopath is so sneaky, and makes sure to do everything in a way that you know they are doing it but they cannot be caught, it’s a fine line between being indifferent to them and enabling them. They end up feeling so omnipotent, they think they can actually get away with anything.

Those who have malignant narcissism and psychopathy, or sociopathic traits or both, do understand the concepts of the law and how they will only go so far. After all, it would an inconvenience for them to end up in prison.

To some degree, let them be the destroyer, but keep evidence along the way, so long as it’s not causing you physical or emotional harm.

However, when things get out of hand, let them know in no uncertain terms what evidence you have on them, because at the end of the day all they are doing is digging themselves an even bigger grave to put themselves in. Having said that, it’s not as if they need one, because they died a long time ago.

_________________________









This is why it’s so hard to get rid of a psychopath, long after you leave him. Because he’s egotistical and controlling, a psychopath can’t get dumped by his girlfriends and move on, the way any normal, self-respecting man would. In fact, to maintain dominance, he usually lies to others about past relationships as easily as he deceives them about current ones. He may falsely claim that he initiated breakups or portray his ex-girlfriends as disturbed. He will even set her up, sending emails or texts as her to make her appear the "crazy one."

The web of lies woven by the psychopath embraces everything and everyone in his life, past, present and future. And so the relationship cycle repeats itself, as the psychopath continually trolls for new partners, tires of current relationships, ends some of them, begins others, only to find his way back, like an unwanted boomerang, into his ex-girlfriends’ lives.

(while this article is written with females as victims; women CAN be psychopaths too)

_________________________



Remember, it is not you - it is them.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Stone's Threats, Provocations and Mood Swings


(POSSIBLE TRIGGER WARNING TO ABUSE VICTIMS; STRONG LANGUAGE WARNING ALSO)

What is disturbing about these messages is the extreme-range swings in mood from Stone. His disregard for Victim 1 & 2's minor child; his assumption that Victim 1 wants to speak to him (she didn't); his threats and attempted provocations.

For victims who may already have trauma issues, such as PTSD or even illness - these threats can provoke extreme fear. While some may find these messages from Stone harmless - we can never know when someone this unpredictable may snap..

In 3+ years, Stone simply will not stop. Everything usual has been tried. EOPC even took down his expose by request of his victims for over 2 years; still the emails and accusations continue unabated. Legal remedies against these are currently being further explored by Stone's victims:


Delivered-To: stonybox@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.242.13 with SMTP id p13cs420983qbh;
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.6.16 with SMTP id j16mr6842443ybi.213.1208782855754;
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:
Received: from QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net
(qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.17])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 62si7754081wri.30.2008.04.21.06.00.54;
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates
76.96.30.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=76.96.30.17;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.17 as permitted sender)
smtp.mail=backbeatone@comcast.net
Received: from OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52])
by QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id GAeS1Z00317UAYkAA0GM00; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:00:08 +0000
Received: from GARY ([24.147.56.158])
by OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id GD0a1Z0013QpPGg8Z00000; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:00:51 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=rITDv7nW5hcA:10 a=qX23_jeXr9QKfTubGy8A:9
a=1_THaeZgReqIjVC3Cr5478f2CPMA:4 a=M15ajoi-1mQA:10 a=RPEWlWjmHvBrYwuazmoA:9
a=fRoY0Z9-3uGuaP9gzwQA:7 a=ZC1k3cNbuOJNgrqZwvYAnChBnp8A:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10
a=ep27abeu6QIyZj3T4wsA:9 a=SlEUxUnRHq0bKptqJ5pIHpoBDEQA:4 a=1Vq_FK4TplAA:10
a=CxA2Utj4LuEA:10 a=8cjj7p-wvfYw1SkCzqQA:9 a=GHq9ccWGwT5QU65o:18
a=PslmfTQ_jD8JqWeu:18 a=Pb2SVzHt4CljGM5T:18 a=R4LhTN6DCaoNIwdWUxUA:9
a=wKbvbaRfYCKVaIy8MQ_Z8aDeJGUA:4 a=KQqxNPgzF0kA:10 a=bC4pTEGzVWIA:10
a=UgPg92xnMUx7xZnr:18
Message-ID: <007701c8a3af$ac2eed60$6501a8c0@GARY>
Reply-To: "Gary Stone"
From: "Gary Stone"
To: "Victim 1"
Subject: brat
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:00:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01C8A38E.241AF890"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
fromGary Stone
reply-toGary Stone

date21 April 2008 13:00
subjectbrat
mailed-bycomcast.net

hide details 21/04/2008 Reply


Fuck [Victim 1 & 2's minor child]! tell Victim 2 I said that. She's a brat. he knows where I live.

---------------------------------

Delivered-To: stonybox@gmail.com
Received: by 10.151.51.5 with SMTP id d5cs54446ybk;
Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.202.15 with SMTP id z15mr9253731waf.72.1211310237545;
Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.123.16 with HTTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:03:57 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1 and Victim 2
Subject: heres a twist
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_3100_18262370.1211310237539"

------=_Part_3100_18262370.1211310237539
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Exploit yer selves change authorship book haha abd sell it yourselves. Er...boob, how r ya? You got Victim 1 in a shit load of trouble with yer changed ways. When i am done with you old chap, they wont let you on the front porch. I hope you don't have designs on that house, i am writing XXXX, and ask her to check my facts son. I will ask her that she should will, under XXXX supervision, that Victim 1 can only live there if you are not involved, she can include me too for all I care. You see son, you don't endanger the people you live with, and, you don't hope to dance on their graves, its a common courtesy. It;s u I want babe. Now you did threaten me, and I am waiting, here i am. No weapons, just natural. fair. u game? boy?

I don't appreciate you sending that to my daughter, and so i have a bone to pick with you, I will let you have first punch it'll be yer last one.

You got a little to cute with me, and I am asking u if you want to dance/ Im here. I wll sign all rights away, you can publish under XXX. XXXX, what do you say> er boob, bob. Victim 2 the acct is mine now, XXXX has another, Victim 1 you gave Victim 2 my daughters email, did Victim 1 make you do it?.Maybe you can hide in Ireland. .Could the irish tolerate the smell? right here youngster,
haha.

--------------------------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 1
Received: by 10.150.216.5 with SMTP id o5cs407477ybg;
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.146.1 with SMTP id t1mr4688133wad.76.1213480497297;
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:
Received: from QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l37si5447022waf.23.2008.06.14.14.54.56;
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.24 as permitted sender) client-ip=76.96.30.24;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=backbeatone@comcast.net
Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27])
by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id dvHg1Z0010b6N64A20AF00; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:54:56 +0000
Received: from GARY ([24.91.151.21])
by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id dxuX1Z0050Tx2SY8Pxuv9g; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:54:56 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=rITDv7nW5hcA:10 a=ZRrvm2JOuL3XyFbeQrYA:9
a=6Eewo1wQTbNoV_alu6BvqCxcir4A:4 a=M15ajoi-1mQA:10 a=RPEWlWjmHvBrYwuazmoA:9
a=aW8Gg4kQ2Bnt7HtbtTAA:7 a=-UReDNFxjMEGJCZaIew2QpVilIMA:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10
a=ep27abeu6QIyZj3T4wsA:9 a=SlEUxUnRHq0bKptqJ5pIHpoBDEQA:4 a=CxA2Utj4LuEA:10
a=1Vq_FK4TplAA:10 a=8cjj7p-wvfYw1SkCzqQA:9 a=GHq9ccWGwT5QU65o:18
a=PslmfTQ_jD8JqWeu:18 a=Pb2SVzHt4CljGM5T:18 a=R4LhTN6DCaoNIwdWUxUA:9
a=wKbvbaRfYCKVaIy8MQ_Z8aDeJGUA:4 a=bC4pTEGzVWIA:10 a=KQqxNPgzF0kA:10
a=UgPg92xnMUx7xZnr:18
Message-ID: <002101c8ce69$2e905d00$6501a8c0@GARY>
Reply-To: "Gary Stone"
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1
Subject: reasons
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:54:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01C8CE47.A5061BE0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
date14 June 2008 21:54
subjectreasons
mailed-bycomcast.net

hide details 14/06/2008 Reply

You are a pig and a slut. You are amoung the lowest pieces of shit, I have ever encountered. I was re-reading the reasons for the report, and I take back my apology for calling you a cunt. You are a cunt, and worse. I shouln't be apologizing to you for anything, you pathetic skank. Street walker have more ethics than you do...

----------------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 1
Received: by 10.150.216.5 with SMTP id o5cs49910ybg;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr9882651waf.189.1215631984583;
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:33:04 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1
Subject:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_3967_25493890.1215631984586"

------=_Part_3967_25493890.1215631984586
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I am calling you, I think you want to talk, but you are afraid, dont be afraid, I wont beat you up.

-------------------------------------

Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP;
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:33:52 +0100
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1

Subject: Re: discuss this with me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_45387_27310100.1216474432452"
References:
Return-Path: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2008 13:33:54.0333 (UTC)
FILETIME=[169C9CD0:01C8E9A4]
------=_Part_45387_27310100.1216474432452
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


I wont beat you up. Please talk.

-----------------------------

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Gary Stone wrote:

> I would like to talk if you feel this book misrepresents you.

------------------------------

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Gary Stone wrote:

>> IM back, I have a little while. Will you discuss this with me or will you
>> stay in the shadows you have grown used to? I have coffee and I am ready to
>> talk. I am going to forward a non response from you to garderner, and remind
>> him, that in his presence you did not pose and an objection to this. I
>> really only want to make you suffer consequences equal to the damage you
>> have done to me, an mine. And move on. I dont have any love feelings
>> anymore, or hate feelings. I cant rationalize positive feelings, and hatred
>> only hurts me. But you are not forgiven obviosly, and thats because you wont
>> make amends.

----------------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 2
Received: by 10.86.49.8 with SMTP id w8cs24949fgw;
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.58.18 with SMTP id l18mr4640652wak.177.1221340889411;
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:21:29 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 2
Subject: end your life on the spot.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_37879_13548303.1221340889402"
------=_Part_37879_13548303.1221340889402
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I want you to understand, that if by design or accident you should ever come within 1500 hundred feet of me, given what I know about you, and given your vile nature, I would consider that a threat to my life, and I would end your life on the spot in self defense, no questions asked.

----------------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 2
Received: by 10.86.49.8 with SMTP id w8cs65255fgw;
Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.79.8 with SMTP id g8mr5416206wal.215.1221427339719;
Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:22:19 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 2
Subject: Sleaze with cheese.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_45140_32884579.1221427339729"
------=_Part_45140_32884579.1221427339729
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

If I ever meet up with you Victim 2, I'm going to name the bones I'm going to break in latin before I break them. What is wrong with her? Is she soft? What the fuck does she see in you you miserable little coward. If you met up with me you'd run. Sleaze with cheese.

-----------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 1
Received: by 10.141.155.18 with SMTP id h18cs180026rvo;
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.75.14 with SMTP id c14mr4075115wal.45.1223210354206;
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:39:14 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1
Subject: dead sure, or dead.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_22061_214733.1223210354193"
------=_Part_22061_214733.1223210354193
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

fiesty this am aren't we. You'd better be dead sure, or dead.
---------------------------------

Number of Entries:
3 (2 this visit)
Entry Page Time:
xxxxxx
Visit Length:
23 hours 7 mins 44 secs
Browser:
IE 8.0
OS:
Win7
Resolution:
1600x900
United States Flag
Total Visits:
2
Location:
Peabody, Massachusetts, United States
IP Address:
Comcast Cable (24.91.126.195) Gary Stone
Referring URL:
(No referring link)
Entry Page:
Exit Page:

These days unemployed Stone is spending thousands of hours a year reading, re-reading, and RE-reading this site. Searching desperately for any reason to file a DCMA takedown notice on some article one of the EOPC Team posted; or rewriting and rehashing his expose.

The only one keeping everything going - is GARY STONE.

Popular Posts

Blog Archive